Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.09447 v2 pith:KI4TBA2O submitted 2021-09-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYstat.AP

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYstat.AP
keywords fairnessbiasfeaturesfvgmverifiersalgorithmsclassifiersalgorithmic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been deployed in safety-critical and high-stake decision-making, where the fairness of algorithms is of paramount importance. Fairness in ML centers on detecting bias towards certain demographic populations induced by an ML classifier and proposes algorithmic solutions to mitigate the bias with respect to different fairness definitions. To this end, several fairness verifiers have been proposed that compute the bias in the prediction of an ML classifier--essentially beyond a finite dataset--given the probability distribution of input features. In the context of verifying linear classifiers, existing fairness verifiers are limited by accuracy due to imprecise modeling of correlations among features and scalability due to restrictive formulations of the classifiers as SSAT/SMT formulas or by sampling. In this paper, we propose an efficient fairness verifier, called FVGM, that encodes the correlations among features as a Bayesian network. In contrast to existing verifiers, FVGM proposes a stochastic subset-sum based approach for verifying linear classifiers. Experimentally, we show that FVGM leads to an accurate and scalable assessment for more diverse families of fairness-enhancing algorithms, fairness attacks, and group/causal fairness metrics than the state-of-the-art fairness verifiers. We also demonstrate that FVGM facilitates the computation of fairness influence functions as a stepping stone to detect the source of bias induced by subsets of features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Monitoring of Static Fairness

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finite-sample PAC monitors for fairness of unknown Markov-chain decision makers, with pointwise and time-uniform soundness guarantees.

  2. Algorithmic Fairness: A Runtime Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fairness is treated as a runtime property over coin-toss sequences, yielding a taxonomy of when monitoring or enforcement is possible.

Pith tools