Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SoK: Machine Learning Governance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.10870 v1 pith:52GYSW6U submitted 2021-09-20 cs.CR cs.LGcs.SE

classification cs.CRcs.LGcs.SE
keywords systemsprincipalssystembenefitscyclefailuresgovernancehighlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) in computer systems introduces not only many benefits but also risks to society. In this paper, we develop the concept of ML governance to balance such benefits and risks, with the aim of achieving responsible applications of ML. Our approach first systematizes research towards ascertaining ownership of data and models, thus fostering a notion of identity specific to ML systems. Building on this foundation, we use identities to hold principals accountable for failures of ML systems through both attribution and auditing. To increase trust in ML systems, we then survey techniques for developing assurance, i.e., confidence that the system meets its security requirements and does not exhibit certain known failures. This leads us to highlight the need for techniques that allow a model owner to manage the life cycle of their system, e.g., to patch or retire their ML system. Put altogether, our systematization of knowledge standardizes the interactions between principals involved in the deployment of ML throughout its life cycle. We highlight opportunities for future work, e.g., to formalize the resulting game between ML principals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dataset Ownership in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes dataset copyright protection into non-intrusive, minimally-intrusive, and maximally-intrusive methods.

Pith tools