Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Incorporating Boundary Uncertainty into loss functions for biomedical image segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.00533 v1 pith:JMXITHIR submitted 2021-10-31 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CVmath.OC

classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CVmath.OC
keywords uncertaintysegmentationboundarybiomedicallabellinglossmanualsoft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Manual segmentation is used as the gold-standard for evaluating neural networks on automated image segmentation tasks. Due to considerable heterogeneity in shapes, colours and textures, demarcating object boundaries is particularly difficult in biomedical images, resulting in significant inter and intra-rater variability. Approaches, such as soft labelling and distance penalty term, apply a global transformation to the ground truth, redefining the loss function with respect to uncertainty. However, global operations are computationally expensive, and neither approach accurately reflects the uncertainty underlying manual annotation. In this paper, we propose the Boundary Uncertainty, which uses morphological operations to restrict soft labelling to object boundaries, providing an appropriate representation of uncertainty in ground truth labels, and may be adapted to enable robust model training where systematic manual segmentation errors are present. We incorporate Boundary Uncertainty with the Dice loss, achieving consistently improved performance across three well-validated biomedical imaging datasets compared to soft labelling and distance-weighted penalty. Boundary Uncertainty not only more accurately reflects the segmentation process, but it is also efficient, robust to segmentation errors and exhibits better generalisation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimization in Sparse 2D to Dense 3D Weakly Supervised Learning: Application to Multi-Label Segmentation of Large ex vivo MRI Data

    eess.IV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse-to-dense 3D segmentation from 2D slices shows divergent regularization needs: 2D benefits from strong augmentation and soft labels while 3D does not, and human-centric preprocessing harms performance.

Pith tools