Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Benchmarking Multimodal AutoML for Tabular Data with Text Fields

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.02705 v1 pith:5GSQ2YXC submitted 2021-11-04 cs.LG cs.CLstat.ML

Benchmarking Multimodal AutoML for Tabular Data with Text Fields

classification cs.LG cs.CLstat.ML
keywords textdatabenchmarkmultimodaltabularautomlcategoricaldatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We consider the use of automated supervised learning systems for data tables that not only contain numeric/categorical columns, but one or more text fields as well. Here we assemble 18 multimodal data tables that each contain some text fields and stem from a real business application. Our publicly-available benchmark enables researchers to comprehensively evaluate their own methods for supervised learning with numeric, categorical, and text features. To ensure that any single modeling strategy which performs well over all 18 datasets will serve as a practical foundation for multimodal text/tabular AutoML, the diverse datasets in our benchmark vary greatly in: sample size, problem types (a mix of classification and regression tasks), number of features (with the number of text columns ranging from 1 to 28 between datasets), as well as how the predictive signal is decomposed between text vs. numeric/categorical features (and predictive interactions thereof). Over this benchmark, we evaluate various straightforward pipelines to model such data, including standard two-stage approaches where NLP is used to featurize the text such that AutoML for tabular data can then be applied. Compared with human data science teams, the fully automated methodology that performed best on our benchmark (stack ensembling a multimodal Transformer with various tree models) also manages to rank 1st place when fit to the raw text/tabular data in two MachineHack prediction competitions and 2nd place (out of 2380 teams) in Kaggle's Mercari Price Suggestion Challenge.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. STRABLE: Benchmarking Tabular Machine Learning with Strings

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A new corpus of 108 mixed string-numeric tables shows that advanced tabular learners with basic string embeddings perform well on most real-world data, while large LLM encoders help on free-text heavy tables.

  2. TabPFN-3: Technical Report

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TabPFN-3 delivers state-of-the-art tabular prediction performance on benchmarks up to 1M rows, is up to 20x faster than prior versions, and introduces test-time scaling that beats non-TabPFN models by hundreds of Elo points.

  3. TabPFN-3: Technical Report

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TabPFN-3 scales tabular foundation models to 1M rows with synthetic pretraining, test-time compute, and benchmark-leading performance on tabular, relational, and tabular-text tasks while being up to 20x faster than Ta...

  4. MachineLearningLM: Scaling Many-shot In-context Learning via Continued Pretraining

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MachineLearningLM uses continued pretraining on SCM-synthesized ML tasks with random-forest distillation to give LLMs robust many-shot in-context learning on tabular classification, reaching random-forest accuracy lev...