REVIEW 2 cited by
Solving the sampling problem of the Sycamore quantum circuits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the problem of generating independent samples from the output distribution of Google's Sycamore quantum circuits with a target fidelity, which is believed to be beyond the reach of classical supercomputers and has been used to demonstrate quantum supremacy. We propose a new method to classically solve this problem by contracting the corresponding tensor network just once, and is massively more efficient than existing methods in obtaining a large number of uncorrelated samples with a target fidelity. For the Sycamore quantum supremacy circuit with $53$ qubits and $20$ cycles, we have generated one million uncorrelated bitstrings $\{\mathbf s\}$ which are sampled from a distribution $\hat P(\mathbf s)=|\hat \psi(\mathbf s)|^2$, where the approximate state $\hat \psi$ has fidelity $F\approx 0.0037$. The whole computation has cost about $15$ hours on a computational cluster with $512$ GPUs. The obtained one million samples, the contraction code and contraction order is made public. If our algorithm could be implemented with high efficiency on a modern supercomputer with ExaFLOPS performance, we estimate that ideally, the simulation would cost a few dozens of seconds, which is faster than Google's quantum hardware.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Strategic Plan for Neutral Atom Quantum Computation
If qubit-count growth (~1.8x/yr) and gate-error reduction (~0.62x/yr) continue, neutral-atom quantum computers could reach practical quantum advantage within a decade, this roadmap projects.
-
A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
A single-author review of all quantum computational advantage claims to date, their classical refutations, and the progress of quantum error correction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.