Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Flatee: Federated Learning Across Trusted Execution Environments

Cryptography and Security · Submitted 12 Nov 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We describe Flatee, an efficient privacy-preserving federated learning framework across TEEs, which considerably reduces training and communication time.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2111.06867 (version 1)
Pith IDEFB5NAMI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationArup Mondal, Debayan Gupta, Ruthu Hulikal Rooparaghunath, Yash More. "Flatee: Federated Learning Across Trusted Execution Environments." arXiv:2111.06867 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/EFB5NAMI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,925 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.07 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.71 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Federated learning allows us to distributively train a machine learning model where multiple parties share local model parameters without sharing private data. However, parameter exchange may still leak information. Several approaches have been proposed to overcome this, based on multi-party computation, fully homomorphic encryption, etc.; many of these protocols are slow and impractical for real-world use as they involve a large number of cryptographic operations. In this paper, we propose the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), which provide a platform for isolated execution of code and handling of data, for this purpose. We describe Flatee, an efficient privacy-preserving federated learning framework across TEEs, which considerably reduces training and communication time. Our framework can handle malicious parties (we do not natively solve adversarial data poisoning, though we describe a preliminary approach to handle this).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Federated learning allows us to distributively train a machine learning model where multiple parties share local model parameters without sharing private data. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.98
s1 However, parameter exchange may still leak information. background 0.84 0.07 0.02 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 Several approaches have been proposed to overcome this, based on multi-party computation, fully homomorphic encryption, etc.; many of these protocols are slow and impractical for real-world use as they involve a large number of cryptographic operations. background 0.83 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.99
s3 In this paper, we propose the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), which provide a platform for isolated execution of code and handling of data, for this purpose. contribution 0.76 0.39 0.10 asserted 0.96
s4 We describe Flatee, an efficient privacy-preserving federated learning framework across TEEs, which considerably reduces training and communication time. contribution 0.97 0.91 0.74 asserted 1.00
s5 Our framework can handle malicious parties (we do not natively solve adversarial data poisoning, though we describe a preliminary approach to handle this). limitation 0.92 0.87 0.06 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Federated learning allows us to distributively train a machine learning model where multiple parties share local model parameters without sharing private data. However, parameter exchange may still leak information. Several approaches have been proposed to overcome this, based on multi-party computation, fully homomorphic encryption, etc.; many of these protocols are slow and impractical for real-world use as they involve a large number of cryptographic operations. In this paper, we propose the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), which provide a platform for isolated execution of code and handling of data, for this purpose. We describe Flatee, an efficient privacy-preserving federated learning framework across TEEs, which considerably reduces training and communication time. Our framework can handle malicious parties (we do not natively solve adversarial data poisoning, though we describe a preliminary approach to handle this).

Human review
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • $𝒮$ and all $𝒫$ have SGX-enabled machines, and agree to train a model $ℳ_FL$. $𝒮$ uses its SGX module to authenticate all $𝒫$ and aggregate the parties' trained models using the federated average function [ref] (e.g., weighted mean, geometric median etc.) to generate the global trained model.

    Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data · Setup. · 0.98

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.