Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Early Detection of Security-Relevant Bug Reports using Machine Learning: How Far Are We?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.10123 v1 pith:J5RBXDDU submitted 2021-12-19 cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reportssecurity-relevantapproacheslearningwhendetectiondevelopmentinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bug reports are common artefacts in software development. They serve as the main channel for users to communicate to developers information about the issues that they encounter when using released versions of software programs. In the descriptions of issues, however, a user may, intentionally or not, expose a vulnerability. In a typical maintenance scenario, such security-relevant bug reports are prioritised by the development team when preparing corrective patches. Nevertheless, when security relevance is not immediately expressed (e.g., via a tag) or rapidly identified by triaging teams, the open security-relevant bug report can become a critical leak of sensitive information that attackers can leverage to perform zero-day attacks. To support practitioners in triaging bug reports, the research community has proposed a number of approaches for the detection of security-relevant bug reports. In recent years, approaches in this respect based on machine learning have been reported with promising performance. Our work focuses on such approaches, and revisits their building blocks to provide a comprehensive view on the current achievements. To that end, we built a large experimental dataset and performed extensive experiments with variations in feature sets and learning algorithms. Eventually, our study highlights different approach configurations that yield best performing classifiers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EvalSVA: Multi-Agent Evaluators for Next-Gen Software Vulnerability Assessment

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM framework with four communication strategies improves CVSS v3.1 vulnerability assessment over single-agent baselines on a new commit dataset spanning C++, Python, and Java.

Pith tools