Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Natural Language Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.11739 v2 pith:OOPUFNEL submitted 2021-12-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords generationresearchdeepevaluationlanguagelearningmethodsnatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive review of the research on Natural Language Generation (NLG) over the past two decades, especially in relation to data-to-text generation and text-to-text generation deep learning methods, as well as new applications of NLG technology. This survey aims to (a) give the latest synthesis of deep learning research on the NLG core tasks, as well as the architectures adopted in the field; (b) detail meticulously and comprehensively various NLG tasks and datasets, and draw attention to the challenges in NLG evaluation, focusing on different evaluation methods and their relationships; (c) highlight some future emphasis and relatively recent research issues that arise due to the increasing synergy between NLG and other artificial intelligence areas, such as computer vision, text and computational creativity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI and Generative AI Transforming Disaster Management: A Survey of Damage Assessment and Response Techniques

    cs.CY 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A narrative review of generative AI for disaster damage assessment that claims to be the first comprehensive survey but suffers from citation mismatches and overlaps with prior reviews.

Pith tools