Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal and Differentially Private Data Acquisition: Central and Local Mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.03968 v2 pith:6NPLQC2S submitted 2022-01-10 cs.GT cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.GTcs.CRcs.LG
keywords privacyusersmechanismproblemcentraldatalocaloptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider a platform's problem of collecting data from privacy sensitive users to estimate an underlying parameter of interest. We formulate this question as a Bayesian-optimal mechanism design problem, in which an individual can share her (verifiable) data in exchange for a monetary reward or services, but at the same time has a (private) heterogeneous privacy cost which we quantify using differential privacy. We consider two popular differential privacy settings for providing privacy guarantees for the users: central and local. In both settings, we establish minimax lower bounds for the estimation error and derive (near) optimal estimators for given heterogeneous privacy loss levels for users. Building on this characterization, we pose the mechanism design problem as the optimal selection of an estimator and payments that will elicit truthful reporting of users' privacy sensitivities. Under a regularity condition on the distribution of privacy sensitivities we develop efficient algorithmic mechanisms to solve this problem in both privacy settings. Our mechanism in the central setting can be implemented in time $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ where $n$ is the number of users and our mechanism in the local setting admits a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Managing Correlations in Data and Privacy Demand

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AHDP, an add-remove heterogeneous differential privacy framework, protects both user data and the user's privacy demand, and correlation-agnostic mechanisms exist for mean, frequency, and linear regression estimation.

Pith tools