Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explanatory Learning: Beyond Empiricism in Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.10222 v1 pith:XD746KBW submitted 2022-01-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLphysics.hist-ph

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLphysics.hist-ph
keywords learningcrnsphenomenaapproachesempiricistend-to-endexplanationexplanations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Explanatory Learning (EL), a framework to let machines use existing knowledge buried in symbolic sequences -- e.g. explanations written in hieroglyphic -- by autonomously learning to interpret them. In EL, the burden of interpreting symbols is not left to humans or rigid human-coded compilers, as done in Program Synthesis. Rather, EL calls for a learned interpreter, built upon a limited collection of symbolic sequences paired with observations of several phenomena. This interpreter can be used to make predictions on a novel phenomenon given its explanation, and even to find that explanation using only a handful of observations, like human scientists do. We formulate the EL problem as a simple binary classification task, so that common end-to-end approaches aligned with the dominant empiricist view of machine learning could, in principle, solve it. To these models, we oppose Critical Rationalist Networks (CRNs), which instead embrace a rationalist view on the acquisition of knowledge. CRNs express several desired properties by construction, they are truly explainable, can adjust their processing at test-time for harder inferences, and can offer strong confidence guarantees on their predictions. As a final contribution, we introduce Odeen, a basic EL environment that simulates a small flatland-style universe full of phenomena to explain. Using Odeen as a testbed, we show how CRNs outperform empiricist end-to-end approaches of similar size and architecture (Transformers) in discovering explanations for novel phenomena.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Scientific Discovery

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A thesis arguing that autonomous symbol interpretation is the key missing capability for artificial scientists, demonstrated through Olivaw, Explanatory Learning on Odeen, the training-free ASIF model, and the Symbol ...

Pith tools