Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.04903 v1 pith:LQKZD6JU submitted 2022-02-10 cs.HC cs.AIcs.SE

Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design

classification cs.HC cs.AIcs.SE
keywords codegenerativedesignexplainabilitygenaimodelsneedssoftware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

What does it mean for a generative AI model to be explainable? The emergent discipline of explainable AI (XAI) has made great strides in helping people understand discriminative models. Less attention has been paid to generative models that produce artifacts, rather than decisions, as output. Meanwhile, generative AI (GenAI) technologies are maturing and being applied to application domains such as software engineering. Using scenario-based design and question-driven XAI design approaches, we explore users' explainability needs for GenAI in three software engineering use cases: natural language to code, code translation, and code auto-completion. We conducted 9 workshops with 43 software engineers in which real examples from state-of-the-art generative AI models were used to elicit users' explainability needs. Drawing from prior work, we also propose 4 types of XAI features for GenAI for code and gathered additional design ideas from participants. Our work explores explainability needs for GenAI for code and demonstrates how human-centered approaches can drive the technical development of XAI in novel domains.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MultiFluxAI Enhancing Platform Engineering with Advanced Agent-Orchestrated Retrieval Systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    The authors claim their MultiFluxAI orchestration framework achieves 95% accuracy and 0-10 ms responses by combining rule-based routing, caching, and graph knowledge stores for multi-service RAG queries.