Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.06481 v3 pith:P3QCPM2P submitted 2022-02-14 cs.LG cs.AI

A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords approachesintuitivelearningphysicalreasoningcognitivedeepphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Research in cognitive science has provided extensive evidence of human cognitive ability in performing physical reasoning of objects from noisy perceptual inputs. Such a cognitive ability is commonly known as intuitive physics. With advancements in deep learning, there is an increasing interest in building intelligent systems that are capable of performing physical reasoning from a given scene for the purpose of building better AI systems. As a result, many contemporary approaches in modelling intuitive physics for machine cognition have been inspired by literature from cognitive science. Despite the wide range of work in physical reasoning for machine cognition, there is a scarcity of reviews that organize and group these deep learning approaches. Especially at the intersection of intuitive physics and artificial intelligence, there is a need to make sense of the diverse range of ideas and approaches. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent advances and techniques in intuitive physics-inspired deep learning approaches for physical reasoning. The survey will first categorize existing deep learning approaches into three facets of physical reasoning before organizing them into three general technical approaches and propose six categorical tasks of the field. Finally, we highlight the challenges of the current field and present some future research directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generation

    cs.CV 2024-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    VideoPhy benchmark shows state-of-the-art text-to-video models follow physical commonsense and text prompts in only 39.6% of cases for the best model.

  2. Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey of physical AI that distinguishes theoretical physics reasoning from applied understanding and synthesizes advances in symbolic reasoning, embodied systems, and generative models to advocate for physics-groun...