Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probing Pretrained Models of Source Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.08975 v3 pith:MSX2QY5F submitted 2022-02-16 cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords codemodelspretrainedprobingdatamodelprocessingsource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning models are widely used for solving challenging code processing tasks, such as code generation or code summarization. Traditionally, a specific model architecture was carefully built to solve a particular code processing task. However, recently general pretrained models such as CodeBERT or CodeT5 have been shown to outperform task-specific models in many applications. While pretrained models are known to learn complex patterns from data, they may fail to understand some properties of source code. To test diverse aspects of code understanding, we introduce a set of diagnosting probing tasks. We show that pretrained models of code indeed contain information about code syntactic structure and correctness, the notions of identifiers, data flow and namespaces, and natural language naming. We also investigate how probing results are affected by using code-specific pretraining objectives, varying the model size, or finetuning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards a Science of Causal Interpretability in Deep Learning for Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The dissertation presents docode, a causal interpretability method for neural code models, and uses a case study to show that some correlations between code properties and model performance are confounded rather than causal.

Pith tools