REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating Object (mis)Detection from a Safety and Reliability Perspective: Discussion and Measures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We argue that object detectors in the safety critical domain should prioritize detection of objects that are most likely to interfere with the actions of the autonomous actor. Especially, this applies to objects that can impact the actor's safety and reliability. To quantify the impact of object (mis)detection on safety and reliability in the context of autonomous driving, we propose new object detection measures that reward the correct identification of objects that are most dangerous and most likely to affect driving decisions. To achieve this, we build an object criticality model to reward the detection of the objects based on proximity, orientation, and relative velocity with respect to the subject vehicle. Then, we apply our model on the recent autonomous driving dataset nuScenes, and we compare nine object detectors. Results show that, in several settings, object detectors that perform best according to the nuScenes ranking are not the preferable ones when the focus is shifted on safety and reliability.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Contour Errors: Ego-Centric Matching for 3D Multi-Object Tracking Performance Evaluation
A modified Hausdorff distance on ego-nearest bounding box corners is proposed as a 3D tracking matching criterion, showing more robust matches than IoU or center-point distance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.