REVIEW 1 cited by
A new approach to calculating BERTScore for automatic assessment of translation quality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The study of the applicability of the BERTScore metric was conducted to translation quality assessment at the sentence level for English -> Russian direction. Experiments were performed with a pre-trained Multilingual BERT as well as with a pair of Monolingual BERT models. To align monolingual embeddings, an orthogonal transformation based on anchor tokens was used. It was demonstrated that such transformation helps to prevent mismatching issue and shown that this approach gives better results than using embeddings of the Multilingual model. To improve the token matching process it is proposed to combine all incomplete WorkPiece tokens into meaningful words and use simple averaging of corresponding vectors and to calculate BERTScore based on anchor tokens only. Such modifications allowed us to achieve a better correlation of the model predictions with human judgments. In addition to evaluating machine translation, several versions of human translation were evaluated as well, the problems of this approach were listed.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization
Across eight languages, n-gram metrics such as ROUGE correlate less with human ratings in fusional languages than in isolating and agglutinative ones, while the neural metric COMET correlates better, especially in low...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.