Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Label-only Model Inversion Attack: The Attack that Requires the Least Information

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.06555 v1 pith:3HQLUU2C submitted 2022-03-13 cs.CR cs.AI

Label-only Model Inversion Attack: The Attack that Requires the Least Information

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords modelattackdatarecordsinversiontargetattacksconfidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In a model inversion attack, an adversary attempts to reconstruct the data records, used to train a target model, using only the model's output. In launching a contemporary model inversion attack, the strategies discussed are generally based on either predicted confidence score vectors, i.e., black-box attacks, or the parameters of a target model, i.e., white-box attacks. However, in the real world, model owners usually only give out the predicted labels; the confidence score vectors and model parameters are hidden as a defense mechanism to prevent such attacks. Unfortunately, we have found a model inversion method that can reconstruct the input data records based only on the output labels. We believe this is the attack that requires the least information to succeed and, therefore, has the best applicability. The key idea is to exploit the error rate of the target model to compute the median distance from a set of data records to the decision boundary of the target model. The distance, then, is used to generate confidence score vectors which are adopted to train an attack model to reconstruct the data records. The experimental results show that highly recognizable data records can be reconstructed with far less information than existing methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.