Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.08242 v1 pith:P7G6Q3US submitted 2022-03-15 cs.CL cs.LG

Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords datamodelscontaminateddownstreamexploitationdatasetsbetterexploit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pretrained language models are typically trained on massive web-based datasets, which are often "contaminated" with downstream test sets. It is not clear to what extent models exploit the contaminated data for downstream tasks. We present a principled method to study this question. We pretrain BERT models on joint corpora of Wikipedia and labeled downstream datasets, and fine-tune them on the relevant task. Comparing performance between samples seen and unseen during pretraining enables us to define and quantify levels of memorization and exploitation. Experiments with two models and three downstream tasks show that exploitation exists in some cases, but in others the models memorize the contaminated data, but do not exploit it. We show that these two measures are affected by different factors such as the number of duplications of the contaminated data and the model size. Our results highlight the importance of analyzing massive web-scale datasets to verify that progress in NLP is obtained by better language understanding and not better data exploitation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2023-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    Min-K% Prob detects pretraining data in LLMs by flagging outlier low-probability words in text, achieving 7.4% better performance than prior methods on the new WIKIMIA benchmark.

  2. Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SSA harness matches frontier model pass@1 scores on agent benchmarks and 138k trajectory analysis in code state-spaces shows model-specific differences in edit frequency, testing activity, and phase transitions.

  3. DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DualEval jointly calibrates LLM abilities and item difficulties/sharpness in a shared latent space using static labels and reward-model scores to unify benchmark and arena-style evaluation.