REVIEW 3 cited by
Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation
read the original abstract
Pretrained language models are typically trained on massive web-based datasets, which are often "contaminated" with downstream test sets. It is not clear to what extent models exploit the contaminated data for downstream tasks. We present a principled method to study this question. We pretrain BERT models on joint corpora of Wikipedia and labeled downstream datasets, and fine-tune them on the relevant task. Comparing performance between samples seen and unseen during pretraining enables us to define and quantify levels of memorization and exploitation. Experiments with two models and three downstream tasks show that exploitation exists in some cases, but in others the models memorize the contaminated data, but do not exploit it. We show that these two measures are affected by different factors such as the number of duplications of the contaminated data and the model size. Our results highlight the importance of analyzing massive web-scale datasets to verify that progress in NLP is obtained by better language understanding and not better data exploitation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models
Min-K% Prob detects pretraining data in LLMs by flagging outlier low-probability words in text, achieving 7.4% better performance than prior methods on the new WIKIMIA benchmark.
-
Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories
SSA harness matches frontier model pass@1 scores on agent benchmarks and 138k trajectory analysis in code state-spaces shows model-specific differences in edit frequency, testing activity, and phase transitions.
-
DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation
DualEval jointly calibrates LLM abilities and item difficulties/sharpness in a shared latent space using static labels and reward-model scores to unify benchmark and arena-style evaluation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.