REVIEW 2 cited by
An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels
read the original abstract
Pre-trained language models derive substantial linguistic and factual knowledge from the massive corpora on which they are trained, and prompt engineering seeks to align these models to specific tasks. Unfortunately, existing prompt engineering methods require significant amounts of labeled data, access to model parameters, or both. We introduce a new method for selecting prompt templates \textit{without labeled examples} and \textit{without direct access to the model}. Specifically, over a set of candidate templates, we choose the template that maximizes the mutual information between the input and the corresponding model output. Across 8 datasets representing 7 distinct NLP tasks, we show that when a template has high mutual information, it also has high accuracy on the task. On the largest model, selecting prompts with our method gets 90\% of the way from the average prompt accuracy to the best prompt accuracy and requires no ground truth labels.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Order Fairness: Mitigating LLMs Order Sensitivity through Dual Group Advantage Optimization
DGAO uses reinforcement learning to optimize LLMs for both accuracy and order stability by balancing intra-group accuracy advantages and inter-group stability advantages.
-
Object Search in Partially-Known Environments via LLM-informed Model-based Planning and Prompt Selection
LLM-estimated object-location probabilities plus map costs yield a model-based planner that beats pure-LLM and optimistic search, while offline replay selects prompts/LLMs faster than UCB.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.