Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Graph Neural Networks in Particle Physics: Implementations, Innovations, and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.12852 v2 pith:RHLZ5M6F submitted 2022-03-23 hep-ex cs.LGhep-ph

classification hep-excs.LGhep-ph
keywords datagnnsgrapharchitecturesbestcapabilitiesindustrylearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many physical systems can be best understood as sets of discrete data with associated relationships. Where previously these sets of data have been formulated as series or image data to match the available machine learning architectures, with the advent of graph neural networks (GNNs), these systems can be learned natively as graphs. This allows a wide variety of high- and low-level physical features to be attached to measurements and, by the same token, a wide variety of HEP tasks to be accomplished by the same GNN architectures. GNNs have found powerful use-cases in reconstruction, tagging, generation and end-to-end analysis. With the wide-spread adoption of GNNs in industry, the HEP community is well-placed to benefit from rapid improvements in GNN latency and memory usage. However, industry use-cases are not perfectly aligned with HEP and much work needs to be done to best match unique GNN capabilities to unique HEP obstacles. We present here a range of these capabilities, predictions of which are currently being well-adopted in HEP communities, and which are still immature. We hope to capture the landscape of graph techniques in machine learning as well as point out the most significant gaps that are inhibiting potentially large leaps in research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.

  2. KIGNet: Physics-Motivated Multi-Graph Representation Learning for Explainable Jet Tagging

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    E-PCN reaches 94.67% macro-accuracy on 10-class jet tagging by weighting graphs with angular separation, transverse momentum, momentum fraction, and invariant mass, with Grad-CAM showing the first two account for 76% ...

  3. Machine Learning Power Week 2023: Clustering in Hadronic Calorimeters

    nucl-ex 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Seven student teams applied K-means, anti-kt, and graph-based methods to ePIC calorimeter clustering; all beat the benchmark, with K-means variants on spherical coordinates performing best.

Pith tools