Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DiffSkill: Skill Abstraction from Differentiable Physics for Deformable Object Manipulations with Tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.17275 v1 pith:QCU5RKHY submitted 2022-03-31 cs.LG cs.CVcs.GRcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.CVcs.GRcs.RO
keywords deformabledifferentiablemanipulationobjecttasksphysicssimulatorskill
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of sequential robotic manipulation of deformable objects using tools. Previous works have shown that differentiable physics simulators provide gradients to the environment state and help trajectory optimization to converge orders of magnitude faster than model-free reinforcement learning algorithms for deformable object manipulation. However, such gradient-based trajectory optimization typically requires access to the full simulator states and can only solve short-horizon, single-skill tasks due to local optima. In this work, we propose a novel framework, named DiffSkill, that uses a differentiable physics simulator for skill abstraction to solve long-horizon deformable object manipulation tasks from sensory observations. In particular, we first obtain short-horizon skills using individual tools from a gradient-based optimizer, using the full state information in a differentiable simulator; we then learn a neural skill abstractor from the demonstration trajectories which takes RGBD images as input. Finally, we plan over the skills by finding the intermediate goals and then solve long-horizon tasks. We show the advantages of our method in a new set of sequential deformable object manipulation tasks compared to previous reinforcement learning algorithms and compared to the trajectory optimizer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmiths

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLMgineer combines VLM-generated URDF tool designs with evolutionary search to co-design tools and action plans, outperforming human-specified and existing tools on a new simulated manipulation benchmark.

  2. RobotSmith: Generative Robotic Tool Design for Acquisition of Complex Manipulation Skills

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RobotSmith autonomously designs, 3D-prints, and uses task-specific tools for robotic manipulation, raising task success from 2.8% (no tool) to 50% in simulation.

Pith tools