REVIEW 3 cited by
Coupling Metric-Affine Gravity to a Higgs-Like Scalar Field
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
General Relativity (GR) exists in different formulations. They are equivalent in pure gravity but generically lead to distinct predictions once matter is included. After a brief overview of various versions of GR, we focus on metric-affine gravity, which avoids any assumption about the vanishing of curvature, torsion or non-metricity. We use it to construct an action of a scalar field coupled non-minimally to gravity. It encompasses as special cases numerous previously studied models. Eliminating non-propagating degrees of freedom, we derive an equivalent theory in the metric formulation of GR. Finally, we give a brief outlook to implications for Higgs inflation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Infrared foundations for quantum geometry II: Catalogue of all torsion-like theories including new ghost-tachyon-free cases
A systematic catalogue of symmetric pair-antisymmetric rank-three field theories yields 22 ghost-tachyon-free models, all propagating vector torsion and none propagating scalar or pseudoscalar torsion.
-
On the Gravitational Origin of the QCD Axion
Derivative-coupled gravitational axions cannot solve the strong CP problem; Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity is identified as the only promising framework for a gravitational QCD axion.
-
Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity with a heavy ALP: Higgs Inflation and $\alpha$-attractors
In a Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity theory with the SM Higgs and a heavy gravitational ALP, tuning two nonminimal couplings reproduces metric Higgs inflation and α-attractor-like inflation with ns≈1−2/N and r≈12/N^2.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.