REVIEW 1 cited by
Boson sampling cannot be faithfully simulated by only the lower-order multi-boson interferences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
To simulate noisy boson sampling approximating it by only the lower-order multi-boson interferences (e.g., by a smaller number of interfering bosons and classical particles) is very popular idea. I show that the output data from any such classical simulations can be efficiently distinguished from that of the quantum device they try to simulate, even with finite noise in the latter. The distinguishing datasets can be the experimental estimates of some large probabilities, a wide class of such is presented. This is a sequel of \textit{Quantum} \textbf{5}, 423 (2021), where I present more accessible account of the main result enhanced by additional insight on the contribution from the higher-order multi-boson interferences in presence of noise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Experimental validation of boson sampling using detector binning
Binned-mode photon-count distributions validate three-photon boson sampling over 50 random interferometers, and their Haar-averaged variance is proportional to the sum of squared photon overlaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.