Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.08570 v2 pith:APSF3NNJ submitted 2022-04-18 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords gnnsaspectsgivegraphnetworkstrustworthyaspectbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made rapid developments in the recent years. Due to their great ability in modeling graph-structured data, GNNs are vastly used in various applications, including high-stakes scenarios such as financial analysis, traffic predictions, and drug discovery. Despite their great potential in benefiting humans in the real world, recent study shows that GNNs can leak private information, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, can inherit and magnify societal bias from training data and lack interpretability, which have risk of causing unintentional harm to the users and society. For example, existing works demonstrate that attackers can fool the GNNs to give the outcome they desire with unnoticeable perturbation on training graph. GNNs trained on social networks may embed the discrimination in their decision process, strengthening the undesirable societal bias. Consequently, trustworthy GNNs in various aspects are emerging to prevent the harm from GNN models and increase the users' trust in GNNs. In this paper, we give a comprehensive survey of GNNs in the computational aspects of privacy, robustness, fairness, and explainability. For each aspect, we give the taxonomy of the related methods and formulate the general frameworks for the multiple categories of trustworthy GNNs. We also discuss the future research directions of each aspect and connections between these aspects to help achieve trustworthiness.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bayesian Membership Privacy for Graph Neural Networks

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces Bayesian Membership Privacy (BMP) as a sampling-aware node-level privacy definition for GNNs quantified by posterior membership probability, plus an auditing method and benchmark experiments.

  2. Impact of Graph Structure on Membership-Inference Risk for Graph Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Graph construction and inference-time edge access modulate node-level membership-inference advantage in GNNs, and the generalization gap is an incomplete proxy.

  3. Explaining the Explainers in Graph Neural Networks: a Comparative Study

    cs.LG 2022-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Benchmark study of ten GNN explainers on eight architectures and six datasets that isolates usable components and issues practical recommendations.

  4. A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.

Pith tools