REVIEW 2 cited by
K-matrix Analysis of e^+e^- Annihilation in the Bottomonium Region
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
K-matrix Analysis of e^+e^- Annihilation in the Bottomonium Region
read the original abstract
We perform the first global and unitary analysis of $e^+e^-\to b\bar{b}$ cross sections. We analyze exclusive cross sections in the $B\bar{B}$, $B^* \bar{B}(+c.c.)$, $B^*\bar{B}^*$, $B_s^*\bar{B}_s^*$, $\Upsilon(nS)\pi^+\pi^-$ and $h_b(nP)\pi^+\pi^-$ channels as well as the total inclusive cross section for $b\bar{b}$ production. Pole positions and residues are determined for four vector states, which we associate with the $\Upsilon(4S)$, $\Upsilon(10750)$, $\Upsilon(5S)$ (or $\Upsilon(10860)$), and $\Upsilon(6S)$ (or $\Upsilon(11020)$). We find strong evidence for the new $\Upsilon(10750)$ recently claimed by Belle, although with parameters not well constrained by the data. Results presented here cast doubt on the validity of branching ratios reported earlier using Breit-Wigner parameterizations or ratios of cross sections. We also compare our results with a selection of theoretical calculations for the vector bottomonium spectrum.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Amplitude analysis of $\psi(3686)\to \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0 $
First amplitude analysis of ψ(3686)→γKS0KS0 with a one-channel K-matrix finds four f0 and three f2 poles consistent with known states and reports branching-fraction ratios to J/ψ decays that constrain possible gluebal...
-
Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV
A coupled-channel framework is developed and fitted to BESIII data on vector charmonium-like states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV range, concluding that coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles explain the line shapes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.