REVIEW 1 cited by
EmoBank: Studying the Impact of Annotation Perspective and Representation Format on Dimensional Emotion Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We describe EmoBank, a corpus of 10k English sentences balancing multiple genres, which we annotated with dimensional emotion metadata in the Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) representation format. EmoBank excels with a bi-perspectival and bi-representational design. On the one hand, we distinguish between writer's and reader's emotions, on the other hand, a subset of the corpus complements dimensional VAD annotations with categorical ones based on Basic Emotions. We find evidence for the supremacy of the reader's perspective in terms of IAA and rating intensity, and achieve close-to-human performance when mapping between dimensional and categorical formats.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MVRS: The Multimodal Virtual Reality Stimuli-based Emotion Recognition Dataset
A new VR-based emotion dataset with synchronized eye tracking, body motion, EMG, and GSR from 13 participants, evaluated with classifiers but with questionable validation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.