Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VulBERTa: Simplified Source Code Pre-Training for Vulnerability Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12424 v1 pith:E3NRRWYT submitted 2022-05-25 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords codeapproachdetectionmodelvulbertavulnerabilityacrossdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents VulBERTa, a deep learning approach to detect security vulnerabilities in source code. Our approach pre-trains a RoBERTa model with a custom tokenisation pipeline on real-world code from open-source C/C++ projects. The model learns a deep knowledge representation of the code syntax and semantics, which we leverage to train vulnerability detection classifiers. We evaluate our approach on binary and multi-class vulnerability detection tasks across several datasets (Vuldeepecker, Draper, REVEAL and muVuldeepecker) and benchmarks (CodeXGLUE and D2A). The evaluation results show that VulBERTa achieves state-of-the-art performance and outperforms existing approaches across different datasets, despite its conceptual simplicity, and limited cost in terms of size of training data and number of model parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMxCPG: Context-Aware Vulnerability Detection Through Code Property Graph-Guided Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMxCPG uses LLM-generated CPG queries to slice code down to vulnerability-relevant paths and a fine-tuned classifier to label those slices, outperforming several baselines on function-level and project-level datasets.

  2. Mono: Is Your "Clean" Vulnerability Dataset Really Solvable? Exposing and Trapping Undecidable Patches and Beyond

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mono reports that 31% of MegaVul patches are non-security and about 16.7% of CVEs are 'undecidable', while its added context raises LLM vulnerability detection F1 by up to 15%.

Pith tools