Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Bound orbits around charged black strings

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 29 May 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We study the geodesics of $5d$ Reissner-Nordstrom and nonsingular black strings, and establish a rational bound orbit taxonomy for both massive as well as null test particles.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2205.14635 (version 6)
Pith ID3TCYONPZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA S. Habibina, H. S. Ramadhan. "Bound orbits around charged black strings." arXiv:2205.14635 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/3TCYONPZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,640 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.37 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.22 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v6. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the geodesics of $5d$ Reissner-Nordstrom and nonsingular black strings, and establish a rational bound orbit taxonomy for both massive as well as null test particles. For the timelike case, test particles with high energy (that would have made them plunge into or scatter off a black hole) could still form bound orbits around the black strings. We calculate the accumulated angles of the corresponding radial periods and show that they are higher than their $4d$ counterparts. For the null case, we found the existence of stable null orbits outside their respective horizons, which do not exist in the four dimensions except at their extremal limit.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the geodesics of $5d$ Reissner-Nordstrom and nonsingular black strings, and establish a rational bound orbit taxonomy for both massive as well as null test particles. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.24 asserted 1.00
s1 For the timelike case, test particles with high energy (that would have made them plunge into or scatter off a black hole) could still form bound orbits around the black strings. result 0.98 0.79 0.29 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 We calculate the accumulated angles of the corresponding radial periods and show that they are higher than their $4d$ counterparts. result 0.99 0.96 0.15 asserted 1.00
s3 For the null case, we found the existence of stable null orbits outside their respective horizons, which do not exist in the four dimensions except at their extremal limit. result 1.00 0.95 0.20 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v6
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the geodesics of $5d$ Reissner-Nordstrom and nonsingular black strings, and establish a rational bound orbit taxonomy for both massive as well as null test particles. For the timelike case, test particles with high energy (that would have made them plunge into or scatter off a black hole) could still form bound orbits around the black strings. We calculate the accumulated angles of the corresponding radial periods and show that they are higher than their $4d$ counterparts. For the null case, we found the existence of stable null orbits outside their respective horizons, which do not exist in the four dimensions except at their extremal limit.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 35 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • Eq. [ref] admits analytical solution in terms of Weierstrass $℘$-function [ref] : [equation] where the initial angle $ϕ_in$ is only dependent on $ϕ_0$ and $y_0$: [equation] Making use of [ref] we have the equation for $ω$ as [equation] which gives the solution of $ω$ in terms of $ϕ$ as [equation] Eq. [ref] is later to play a significant role in enabling null bound orbit outside the string's horizons.

    Test particle motion in the space-time of a Kerr black hole pierced by a cosmic string · Exact Solutions of the Geodesic · 0.87

Uses data or values from 4 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
  • This no-horizon case does not violate the cosmic censorship theorem [ref] since no singularity is present, and indeed the formation of naked Bardeen spacetime as a result of destroying its event horizon is strongly supported theoretically [ref] .

    Destroying the event horizon of regular black holes · Nonsingular Black String · 0.98

Cites as background 15 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.