Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interpolating between small- and large-$g$ expansions using Bayesian Model Mixing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.04116 v2 pith:VVTZOA5X submitted 2022-06-08 nucl-th hep-phphysics.data-an

classification nucl-thhep-phphysics.data-an
keywords mixingfunctionmethodspredictivebayesianexpansionexpansionsgaussian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Bayesian Model Mixing (BMM) is a statistical technique that can be used to combine models that are predictive in different input domains into a composite distribution that has improved predictive power over the entire input space. We explore the application of BMM to the mixing of two expansions of a function of a coupling constant $g$ that are valid at small and large values of $g$ respectively. This type of problem is quite common in nuclear physics, where physical properties are straightforwardly calculable in strong and weak interaction limits or at low and high densities or momentum transfers, but difficult to calculate in between. Interpolation between these limits is often accomplished by a suitable interpolating function, e.g., Pad\'e approximants, but it is then unclear how to quantify the uncertainty of the interpolant. We address this problem in the simple context of the partition function of zero-dimensional $\phi^4$ theory, for which the (asymptotic) expansion at small $g$ and the (convergent) expansion at large $g$ are both known. We consider three mixing methods: linear mixture BMM, localized bivariate BMM, and localized multivariate BMM with Gaussian processes. We find that employing a Gaussian process in the intermediate region between the two predictive models leads to the best results of the three methods. The methods and validation strategies we present here should be generalizable to other nuclear physics settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian analysis of properties of nuclear matter with the FOPI experimental data

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bayesian fits to FOPI Au+Au flow and stopping data yield m*/m0 around 0.78-0.88 and F around 0.75-0.88, while K0 remains unconstrained.

Pith tools