Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.05229 v1 pith:KVGGSIMO submitted 2022-06-10 cs.LG

Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances

classification cs.LG
keywords carboncloudintensityemissionssoftwareimpactinstancesoperational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

By providing unprecedented access to computational resources, cloud computing has enabled rapid growth in technologies such as machine learning, the computational demands of which incur a high energy cost and a commensurate carbon footprint. As a result, recent scholarship has called for better estimates of the greenhouse gas impact of AI: data scientists today do not have easy or reliable access to measurements of this information, precluding development of actionable tactics. Cloud providers presenting information about software carbon intensity to users is a fundamental stepping stone towards minimizing emissions. In this paper, we provide a framework for measuring software carbon intensity, and propose to measure operational carbon emissions by using location-based and time-specific marginal emissions data per energy unit. We provide measurements of operational software carbon intensity for a set of modern models for natural language processing and computer vision, and a wide range of model sizes, including pretraining of a 6.1 billion parameter language model. We then evaluate a suite of approaches for reducing emissions on the Microsoft Azure cloud compute platform: using cloud instances in different geographic regions, using cloud instances at different times of day, and dynamically pausing cloud instances when the marginal carbon intensity is above a certain threshold. We confirm previous results that the geographic region of the data center plays a significant role in the carbon intensity for a given cloud instance, and find that choosing an appropriate region can have the largest operational emissions reduction impact. We also show that the time of day has notable impact on operational software carbon intensity. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for how machine learning practitioners can use software carbon intensity information to reduce environmental impact.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Hidden Cost of Thinking: Energy Use and Environmental Impact of LMs Beyond Pretraining

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Full development of 7B and 32B Olmo 3 models used 12.3 GWh datacenter energy and emitted 4,251 tCO2eq, with development overheads accounting for 82% of compute and reasoning models costing 17x more to post-train than ...

  2. How Creatives Approach GenAI Image Generation: Tensions Between Structured Guidance, Self-Experimentation, and Creative Autonomy

    cs.HC 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    Creatives prefer self-experimentation over structured guidance for GenAI image tools to preserve creative freedom, even when guidance aids AI literacy.

  3. Assessing the Carbon Emissions and Energy Consumption of U.S. Hyperscale Data Centers

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    US hyperscale data centers consumed 68-99 TWh electricity and emitted 37-54 Mt CO2, representing 1.8% of US electricity use with average carbon intensity 48% above the national grid average.

  4. How Creatives Approach GenAI Image Generation: Tensions Between Structured Guidance, Self-Experimentation, and Creative Autonomy

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Qualitative studies show creatives prefer self-experimentation over structured guidance for GenAI image tools to preserve creative autonomy despite terminology barriers.

  5. Assessing the Energy and Carbon Emissions of Neural Speaker Verification Model in Training and Inference

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Empirical study finds diminishing accuracy returns against steep energy growth for deeper and wider ResNet speaker verification models on VoxCeleb2.