Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09426 v2 pith:K352MRPI submitted 2022-06-19 cs.LG cs.AI

ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords adbenchanomalybenchmarkdetectionalgorithmscomprehensivedatasetsresearchers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Given a long list of anomaly detection algorithms developed in the last few decades, how do they perform with regard to (i) varying levels of supervision, (ii) different types of anomalies, and (iii) noisy and corrupted data? In this work, we answer these key questions by conducting (to our best knowledge) the most comprehensive anomaly detection benchmark with 30 algorithms on 57 benchmark datasets, named ADBench. Our extensive experiments (98,436 in total) identify meaningful insights into the role of supervision and anomaly types, and unlock future directions for researchers in algorithm selection and design. With ADBench, researchers can easily conduct comprehensive and fair evaluations for newly proposed methods on the datasets (including our contributed ones from natural language and computer vision domains) against the existing baselines. To foster accessibility and reproducibility, we fully open-source ADBench and the corresponding results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Debugging the Debuggers: Failure-Anchored Structured Recovery for Software Engineering Agents

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PROBE structures runtime telemetry into diagnoses and evidence-grounded guidance, raising recovery rates by 12.45 points over baselines on 257 unresolved software repair and AIOps cases.

  2. VAE with Hyperspherical Coordinates: Improving Anomaly Detection from Hypervolume-Compressed Latent Space

    cs.LG 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VAEs using hyperspherical latent coordinates compress the hypervolume to achieve superior unconditional and conditional anomaly detection on complex image datasets.

  3. Debugging the Debuggers: Failure-Anchored Structured Recovery for Software Engineering Agents

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PROBE turns runtime telemetry from failed software engineering agent runs into evidence-grounded diagnoses and actionable recovery guidance, achieving 65.37% diagnosis accuracy and 21.79% recovery rate on 257 cases.

  4. Calibrating Tabular Anomaly Detection via Optimal Transport

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    CTAD calibrates anomaly scores via optimal transport distance on empirical and K-means structural distributions of normal data, yielding consistent gains across 34 tabular datasets and seven detector types.

  5. VAE with Hyperspherical Coordinates: Improving Anomaly Detection from Hypervolume-Compressed Latent Space

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Compressing a VAE's latent vectors onto a small 'island' on a hypersphere improves kNN-based anomaly detection on several image benchmarks.