Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FairGrad: Fairness Aware Gradient Descent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10923 v2 pith:WANVCJYY submitted 2022-06-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairgradfairnessgroupimplementpypistandardvariousaccommodates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We address the problem of group fairness in classification, where the objective is to learn models that do not unjustly discriminate against subgroups of the population. Most existing approaches are limited to simple binary tasks or involve difficult to implement training mechanisms which reduces their practical applicability. In this paper, we propose FairGrad, a method to enforce fairness based on a re-weighting scheme that iteratively learns group specific weights based on whether they are advantaged or not. FairGrad is easy to implement, accommodates various standard fairness definitions, and comes with minimal overhead. Furthermore, we show that it is competitive with standard baselines over various datasets including ones used in natural language processing and computer vision. FairGrad is available as a PyPI package at - https://pypi.org/project/fairgrad

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PSMGD: Periodic Stochastic Multi-Gradient Descent for Fast Multi-Objective Optimization

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Periodically reusing MGDA-style weights reduces multi-objective training cost, with claimed SOTA convergence rates, but the strongly convex proof contains an invalid step.

Pith tools