Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Causality for Inherently Explainable Transformers: CAT-XPLAIN

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.14841 v1 pith:LDYS36DQ submitted 2022-06-29 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords explainableinherentlymodelexplanationpost-hoccat-xplainexplainermethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

There have been several post-hoc explanation approaches developed to explain pre-trained black-box neural networks. However, there is still a gap in research efforts toward designing neural networks that are inherently explainable. In this paper, we utilize a recently proposed instance-wise post-hoc causal explanation method to make an existing transformer architecture inherently explainable. Once trained, our model provides an explanation in the form of top-$k$ regions in the input space of the given instance contributing to its decision. We evaluate our method on binary classification tasks using three image datasets: MNIST, FMNIST, and CIFAR. Our results demonstrate that compared to the causality-based post-hoc explainer model, our inherently explainable model achieves better explainability results while eliminating the need of training a separate explainer model. Our code is available at https://github.com/mvrl/CAT-XPLAIN.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Latent Flow Transformer

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LFT replaces up to 13 of 24 transformer layers of Pythia-410M with a single flow-based layer trained with Flow Walking, achieving KL 0.736 vs 0.932 for skipping three layers.

Pith tools