REVIEW 1 cited by
SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice
read the original abstract
Social media platforms have been establishing content moderation guidelines and employing various moderation policies to counter hate speech and misinformation. The goal of this paper is to study these community guidelines and moderation practices, as well as the relevant research publications, to identify the research gaps, differences in moderation techniques, and challenges that should be tackled by the social media platforms and the research community. To this end, we study and analyze fourteen most popular social media content moderation guidelines and practices, and consolidate them. We then introduce three taxonomies drawn from this analysis as well as covering over two hundred interdisciplinary research papers about moderation strategies. We identify the differences between the content moderation employed in mainstream and fringe social media platforms. Finally, we have in-depth applied discussions on both research and practical challenges and solutions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Power of Social Norms: How Initial Responses to Toxicity Shape Conversations on Twitter
Observational study of Twitter data shows initial responses and conversation size before a toxic tweet correlate with subsequent toxicity levels via social norms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.