Rebuttal to: "Comment on Scaling properties of background- and chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation in heavy ion collisions at $\sqrt{s}_{\rm NN}=200$ GeV"

New York; Niseem Magdy (Depts. of Chemistry; Physics; Roy A. Lacey; Stony Brook; Stony Brook University; USA)

REVIEW

Rebuttal to: "Comment on Scaling properties of background- and chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation in heavy ion collisions at $\sqrt{s}_{\rm NN}=200$ GeV"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.04966 v1 pith:QCOPQCGU submitted 2022-07-11 nucl-ex hep-exhep-phnucl-th

Roy A. Lacey , Niseem Magdy (Depts. of Chemistry , Physics , Stony Brook University , Stony Brook , New York , USA) This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-exhep-exhep-phnucl-th

keywords claimsbackground-chargechiral-magnetically-drivencollisionsconclusionheavyproperties

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

abstract

Recently, F. Wang commented on our work "Scaling properties of background- and chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation in heavy ion collisions at $\sqrt{s}_{\rm NN} = 200$ GeV" and made several claims to support his conclusion that our results are fallacious. His conclusion and claims are not only incorrect; they show a fundamental disconnect with the rudiments of the $R_{\Psi_2}(\Delta S)$ correlator. This rebuttal addresses the root misconception responsible for Wang's false claims.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools