REVIEW 2 cited by
Abstraction between Structural Causal Models: A Review of Definitions and Properties
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Structural causal models (SCMs) are a widespread formalism to deal with causal systems. A recent direction of research has considered the problem of relating formally SCMs at different levels of abstraction, by defining maps between SCMs and imposing a requirement of interventional consistency. This paper offers a review of the solutions proposed so far, focusing on the formal properties of a map between SCMs, and highlighting the different layers (structural, distributional) at which these properties may be enforced. This allows us to distinguish families of abstractions that may or may not be permitted by choosing to guarantee certain properties instead of others. Such an understanding not only allows to distinguish among proposal for causal abstraction with more awareness, but it also allows to tailor the definition of abstraction with respect to the forms of abstraction relevant to specific applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CLAM: Causal Spatial Disaggregation to Infer Local Effects From Coarse Data
CLAM jointly learns a shared subregional mechanism and a spatial disaggregation from aggregated outcomes, recovering a subregional treatment effect (LOCATE) from coarse data.
-
Factored space models: Towards causality between levels of abstraction
Structural independence in a factored space is equivalent to conditional independence in all product distributions, generalizing d-separation to deterministic functions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.