Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient Long-Text Understanding with Short-Text Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.00748 v3 pith:BT4QT6OY submitted 2022-08-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords longunderstandingacrosslanguagemodelspretrainedshort-textsled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer-based pretrained language models (LMs) are ubiquitous across natural language understanding, but cannot be applied to long sequences such as stories, scientific articles and long documents, due to their quadratic complexity. While a myriad of efficient transformer variants have been proposed, they are typically based on custom implementations that require expensive pretraining from scratch. In this work, we propose SLED: SLiding-Encoder and Decoder, a simple approach for processing long sequences that re-uses and leverages battle-tested short-text pretrained LMs. Specifically, we partition the input into overlapping chunks, encode each with a short-text LM encoder and use the pretrained decoder to fuse information across chunks (fusion-in-decoder). We illustrate through controlled experiments that SLED offers a viable strategy for long text understanding and evaluate our approach on SCROLLS, a benchmark with seven datasets across a wide range of language understanding tasks. We find that SLED is competitive with specialized models that are up to 50x larger and require a dedicated and expensive pretraining step.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is my Meeting Summary Good? Estimating Quality with a Multi-LLM Evaluator

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent, self-training LLM framework called MESA evaluates meeting summaries by detecting eight error types and reports higher correlation with human scores than existing automatic metrics.

Pith tools