Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.06102 v2 pith:UOKYAHFU submitted 2022-08-12 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DC
keywords energytrainingzeusconsumptionefficiencyimproveoftenoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training deep neural networks (DNNs) is becoming increasingly more resource- and energy-intensive every year. Unfortunately, existing works primarily focus on optimizing DNN training for faster completion, often without considering the impact on energy efficiency. In this paper, we observe that common practices to improve training performance can often lead to inefficient energy usage. More importantly, we demonstrate that there is a tradeoff between energy consumption and performance optimization. To this end, we propose Zeus, an optimization framework to navigate this tradeoff by automatically finding optimal job- and GPU-level configurations for recurring DNN training jobs. Zeus uses an online exploration-exploitation approach in conjunction with just-in-time energy profiling, averting the need for expensive offline measurements, while adapting to data drifts over time. Our evaluation shows that Zeus can improve the energy efficiency of DNN training by 15.3%-75.8% for diverse workloads.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Opti-Q: A Constraint-Based Optimization Framework for Multi-LLM Question Planning

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Per-question database-style plan search over multi-LLM DAGs improves QA quality under budgets by ~58% (MMLU-Pro) and ~41% (SimpleQA) versus reimplemented baselines.

Pith tools