Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.04963 v4 pith:5O7VAWSL submitted 2022-09-12 cs.AI cs.CYcs.SE

classification cs.AIcs.CYcs.SE
keywords responsiblepatternscataloguegovernancepatternbeenbestbeyond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI. Recently, a number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much beyond truisms. Also, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm-level rather than system-level, mainly focusing on a subset of mathematics-amenable ethical principles, such as fairness. Nevertheless, ethical issues can arise at any step of the development lifecycle, cutting across many AI and non-AI components of systems beyond AI algorithms and models. To operationalize responsible AI from a system perspective, in this paper, we present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR). Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle. The Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue classifies the patterns into three groups: multi-level governance patterns, trustworthy process patterns, and responsible-AI-by-design product patterns. These patterns provide systematic and actionable guidance for stakeholders to implement responsible AI.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Effective AI Governance: A Review of Principles

    cs.SE 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A rapid tertiary review of nine AI governance reviews finds a focus on high-level frameworks and principles, with little concrete guidance on governance mechanisms.

Pith tools