Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Overview of the Data-Loader Landscape: Comparative Performance Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.13705 v1 pith:MDMXZNKH submitted 2022-09-27 cs.DC cs.CVcs.LGcs.PF

classification cs.DCcs.CVcs.LGcs.PF
keywords performancetrainingdatafeatureslearningstorageadvancesanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dataloaders, in charge of moving data from storage into GPUs while training machine learning models, might hold the key to drastically improving the performance of training jobs. Recent advances have shown promise not only by considerably decreasing training time but also by offering new features such as loading data from remote storage like S3. In this paper, we are the first to distinguish the dataloader as a separate component in the Deep Learning (DL) workflow and to outline its structure and features. Finally, we offer a comprehensive comparison of the different dataloading libraries available, their trade-offs in terms of functionality, usability, and performance and the insights derived from them.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools