REVIEW 2 cited by
Rank-N-Contrast: Learning Continuous Representations for Regression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep regression models typically learn in an end-to-end fashion without explicitly emphasizing a regression-aware representation. Consequently, the learned representations exhibit fragmentation and fail to capture the continuous nature of sample orders, inducing suboptimal results across a wide range of regression tasks. To fill the gap, we propose Rank-N-Contrast (RNC), a framework that learns continuous representations for regression by contrasting samples against each other based on their rankings in the target space. We demonstrate, theoretically and empirically, that RNC guarantees the desired order of learned representations in accordance with the target orders, enjoying not only better performance but also significantly improved robustness, efficiency, and generalization. Extensive experiments using five real-world regression datasets that span computer vision, human-computer interaction, and healthcare verify that RNC achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting its intriguing properties including better data efficiency, robustness to spurious targets and data corruptions, and generalization to distribution shifts. Code is available at: https://github.com/kaiwenzha/Rank-N-Contrast.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Supervised Contrastive Learning for Ordinal Engagement Measurement
A supervised contrastive ordinal classifier with time-series augmentation improves minority-class recall on DAiSEE, but not overall accuracy, and the best non-contrastive baseline nearly matches it.
-
Revisiting LLMs as Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasters: Small Noise Can Break Large Models
Zero-shot LLM forecasters are more sensitive to noise and generally less accurate than single-shot linear models.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.