REVIEW 3 cited by
Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints
read the original abstract
In this work, we focus on improving the accuracy-variance trade-off for state-of-the-art differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods. First, we design a general framework that uses aggregates of intermediate checkpoints \emph{during training} to increase the accuracy of DP ML techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate that training over aggregates can provide significant gains in prediction accuracy over the existing state-of-the-art for StackOverflow, CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets. For instance, we improve the state-of-the-art DP StackOverflow accuracies to 22.74\% (+2.06\% relative) for $\epsilon=8.2$, and 23.90\% (+2.09\%) for $\epsilon=18.9$. Furthermore, these gains magnify in settings with periodically varying training data distributions. We also demonstrate that our methods achieve relative improvements of 0.54\% and 62.6\% in terms of utility and variance, on a proprietary, production-grade pCVR task. Lastly, we initiate an exploration into estimating the uncertainty (variance) that DP noise adds in the predictions of DP ML models. We prove that, under standard assumptions on the loss function, the sample variance from last few checkpoints provides a good approximation of the variance of the final model of a DP run. Empirically, we show that the last few checkpoints can provide a reasonable lower bound for the variance of a converged DP model. Crucially, all the methods proposed in this paper operate on \emph{a single training run} of the DP ML technique, thus incurring no additional privacy cost.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation
Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.
-
Differentially Private Model Merging
Post-processing via random selection or linear combination generates differentially private models for arbitrary privacy parameters from pre-trained models on the same dataset.
-
Differentially Private Model Merging
Post-processing via random selection or linear combination of differentially private models allows meeting arbitrary target privacy parameters without additional training.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.