Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01864 v2 pith:H2EFE46N submitted 2022-10-04 cs.LG cs.CR

Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints

classification cs.LG cs.CR
keywords variancecheckpointstrainingmethodsstate-of-the-artaccuracyaggregatesdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this work, we focus on improving the accuracy-variance trade-off for state-of-the-art differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods. First, we design a general framework that uses aggregates of intermediate checkpoints \emph{during training} to increase the accuracy of DP ML techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate that training over aggregates can provide significant gains in prediction accuracy over the existing state-of-the-art for StackOverflow, CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets. For instance, we improve the state-of-the-art DP StackOverflow accuracies to 22.74\% (+2.06\% relative) for $\epsilon=8.2$, and 23.90\% (+2.09\%) for $\epsilon=18.9$. Furthermore, these gains magnify in settings with periodically varying training data distributions. We also demonstrate that our methods achieve relative improvements of 0.54\% and 62.6\% in terms of utility and variance, on a proprietary, production-grade pCVR task. Lastly, we initiate an exploration into estimating the uncertainty (variance) that DP noise adds in the predictions of DP ML models. We prove that, under standard assumptions on the loss function, the sample variance from last few checkpoints provides a good approximation of the variance of the final model of a DP run. Empirically, we show that the last few checkpoints can provide a reasonable lower bound for the variance of a converged DP model. Crucially, all the methods proposed in this paper operate on \emph{a single training run} of the DP ML technique, thus incurring no additional privacy cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation

    cs.DS 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.

  2. Differentially Private Model Merging

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Post-processing via random selection or linear combination generates differentially private models for arbitrary privacy parameters from pre-trained models on the same dataset.

  3. Differentially Private Model Merging

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Post-processing via random selection or linear combination of differentially private models allows meeting arbitrary target privacy parameters without additional training.