Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dual-Domain Cross-Iteration Squeeze-Excitation Network for Sparse Reconstruction of Brain MRI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.02523 v2 pith:FVDBKBP2 submitted 2022-10-05 cs.CV cs.AI

Dual-Domain Cross-Iteration Squeeze-Excitation Network for Sparse Reconstruction of Brain MRI

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords k-spacereconstructionsparseappliedartifactsbraincasesclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most commonly applied tests in neurology and neurosurgery. However, the utility of MRI is largely limited by its long acquisition time, which might induce many problems including patient discomfort and motion artifacts. Acquiring fewer k-space sampling is a potential solution to reducing the total scanning time. However, it can lead to severe aliasing reconstruction artifacts and thus affect the clinical diagnosis. Nowadays, deep learning has provided new insights into the sparse reconstruction of MRI. In this paper, we present a new approach to this problem that iteratively fuses the information of k-space and MRI images using novel dual Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Cross-Iteration Residual Connections. This study included 720 clinical multi-coil brain MRI cases adopted from the open-source deidentified fastMRI Dataset. 8-folder downsampling rate was applied to generate the sparse k-space. Results showed that the average reconstruction error over 120 testing cases by our proposed method was 2.28%, which outperformed the existing image-domain prediction (6.03%, p<0.001), k-space synthesis (6.12%, p<0.001), and dual-domain feature fusion (4.05%, p<0.001).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.