Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.03735 v2 pith:6MQBEPCK submitted 2022-10-02 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CVcs.CY

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CVcs.CY
keywords explanationsexplainabilityparticipantsunderstandingend-usershelphuman-aiinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the proliferation of explainable AI (XAI) methods, little is understood about end-users' explainability needs and behaviors around XAI explanations. To address this gap and contribute to understanding how explainability can support human-AI interaction, we conducted a mixed-methods study with 20 end-users of a real-world AI application, the Merlin bird identification app, and inquired about their XAI needs, uses, and perceptions. We found that participants desire practically useful information that can improve their collaboration with the AI, more so than technical system details. Relatedly, participants intended to use XAI explanations for various purposes beyond understanding the AI's outputs: calibrating trust, improving their task skills, changing their behavior to supply better inputs to the AI, and giving constructive feedback to developers. Finally, among existing XAI approaches, participants preferred part-based explanations that resemble human reasoning and explanations. We discuss the implications of our findings and provide recommendations for future XAI design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Systematic Review of User-Centred Evaluation of Explainable AI in Healthcare

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 82 healthcare XAI user studies produces an updated property framework and context-sensitive guidelines for evaluation design.

Pith tools