Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Relational Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Multihop Reasoning: A Comparative Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.06418 v2 pith:BNUXGTWK submitted 2022-10-12 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords graphmultihopnetworksnodereasoningrelationstaskbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multihop Question Answering is a complex Natural Language Processing task that requires multiple steps of reasoning to find the correct answer to a given question. Previous research has explored the use of models based on Graph Neural Networks for tackling this task. Various architectures have been proposed, including Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (RGCN). For these many node types and relations between them have been introduced, such as simple entity co-occurrences, modelling coreferences, or "reasoning paths" from questions to answers via intermediary entities. Nevertheless, a thoughtful analysis on which relations, node types, embeddings and architecture are the most beneficial for this task is still missing. In this paper we explore a number of RGCN-based Multihop QA models, graph relations, and node embeddings, and empirically explore the influence of each on Multihop QA performance on the WikiHop dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models Still Face Challenges in Multi-Hop Reasoning with External Knowledge

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-3.5 with chain-of-thought prompting still fails often on multi-hop reasoning with external knowledge, especially with distractors, counterfactual facts, non-sequential proof structures, and higher hop counts.

Pith tools