Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Perform Complex Tasks through Compositional Fine-Tuning of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.12607 v1 pith:BELDARGX submitted 2022-10-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords tasktasksfine-tuningchaincomponentcompositionallearningprompting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How to usefully encode compositional task structure has long been a core challenge in AI. Recent work in chain of thought prompting has shown that for very large neural language models (LMs), explicitly demonstrating the inferential steps involved in a target task may improve performance over end-to-end learning that focuses on the target task alone. However, chain of thought prompting has significant limitations due to its dependency on huge pretrained LMs. In this work, we present compositional fine-tuning (CFT): an approach based on explicitly decomposing a target task into component tasks, and then fine-tuning smaller LMs on a curriculum of such component tasks. We apply CFT to recommendation tasks in two domains, world travel and local dining, as well as a previously studied inferential task (sports understanding). We show that CFT outperforms end-to-end learning even with equal amounts of data, and gets consistently better as more component tasks are modeled via fine-tuning. Compared with chain of thought prompting, CFT performs at least as well using LMs only 7.4% of the size, and is moreover applicable to task domains for which data are not available during pretraining.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. E.A.R.T.H.: Structuring Creative Evolution through Model Error in Generative AI

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A five-stage pipeline that induces, scores, rewrites, and validates model errors reports large creativity gains that largely arise from selection on the measurement metric itself.

Pith tools