Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Far Side of Failure: Investigating the Impact of Speech Recognition Errors on Subsequent Dementia Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.07430 v1 pith:KFUAPNN4 submitted 2022-11-11 eess.AS cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGq-bio.QM

classification eess.AScs.AIcs.CLcs.LGq-bio.QM
keywords speechclassificationclinicaldementiadownstreamtranscriptsaccuracyapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Linguistic anomalies detectable in spontaneous speech have shown promise for various clinical applications including screening for dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment. The feasibility of deploying automated tools that can classify language samples obtained from speech in large-scale clinical settings depends on the ability to capture and automatically transcribe the speech for subsequent analysis. However, the impressive performance of self-supervised learning (SSL) automatic speech recognition (ASR) models with curated speech data is not apparent with challenging speech samples from clinical settings. One of the key questions for successfully applying ASR models for clinical applications is whether imperfect transcripts they generate provide sufficient information for downstream tasks to operate at an acceptable level of accuracy. In this study, we examine the relationship between the errors produced by several deep learning ASR systems and their impact on the downstream task of dementia classification. One of our key findings is that, paradoxically, ASR systems with relatively high error rates can produce transcripts that result in better downstream classification accuracy than classification based on verbatim transcripts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Not All Errors Are Equal: Investigation of Speech Recognition Errors in Alzheimer's Disease Detection

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The analysis of ASR errors in BERT-based Alzheimer's detection shows that stopwords dominate the errors but barely affect classification, while task-related keywords are transcribed accurately and are the decisive factor.

Pith tools