Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CAPE: Corrective Actions from Precondition Errors using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.09935 v3 pith:N6W3KWGN submitted 2022-11-17 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.RO
keywords capelanguageactionsapproachcorrectnessplansactionapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Extracting commonsense knowledge from a large language model (LLM) offers a path to designing intelligent robots. Existing approaches that leverage LLMs for planning are unable to recover when an action fails and often resort to retrying failed actions, without resolving the error's underlying cause. We propose a novel approach (CAPE) that attempts to propose corrective actions to resolve precondition errors during planning. CAPE improves the quality of generated plans by leveraging few-shot reasoning from action preconditions. Our approach enables embodied agents to execute more tasks than baseline methods while ensuring semantic correctness and minimizing re-prompting. In VirtualHome, CAPE generates executable plans while improving a human-annotated plan correctness metric from 28.89% to 49.63% over SayCan. Our improvements transfer to a Boston Dynamics Spot robot initialized with a set of skills (specified in language) and associated preconditions, where CAPE improves the correctness metric of the executed task plans by 76.49% compared to SayCan. Our approach enables the robot to follow natural language commands and robustly recover from failures, which baseline approaches largely cannot resolve or address inefficiently.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Triple-S: A Collaborative Multi-LLM Framework for Solving Long-Horizon Implicative Tasks in Robotics

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Triple-S combines instruction simplification, retrieval of similar examples, and a summary-based library update to improve LLM-generated robot policy code on long-horizon implicative tasks.

  2. AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Code

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AccessGuru combines accessibility testing tools and LLM prompting to correct syntactic, semantic, and layout HTML accessibility violations, reporting up to 84% average violation score decrease on a new benchmark.

Pith tools