REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Good Practices for Missing Modality Robust Action Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Standard multi-modal models assume the use of the same modalities in training and inference stages. However, in practice, the environment in which multi-modal models operate may not satisfy such assumption. As such, their performances degrade drastically if any modality is missing in the inference stage. We ask: how can we train a model that is robust to missing modalities? This paper seeks a set of good practices for multi-modal action recognition, with a particular interest in circumstances where some modalities are not available at an inference time. First, we study how to effectively regularize the model during training (e.g., data augmentation). Second, we investigate on fusion methods for robustness to missing modalities: we find that transformer-based fusion shows better robustness for missing modality than summation or concatenation. Third, we propose a simple modular network, ActionMAE, which learns missing modality predictive coding by randomly dropping modality features and tries to reconstruct them with the remaining modality features. Coupling these good practices, we build a model that is not only effective in multi-modal action recognition but also robust to modality missing. Our model achieves the state-of-the-arts on multiple benchmarks and maintains competitive performances even in missing modality scenarios. Codes are available at https://github.com/sangminwoo/ActionMAE.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Transformer-based Multisensor Data Fusion of Ultrasonic Guided Wave and FBG-based Strain Measurements for Multitask Aerospace Structural Health Monitoring
Transformer fusion of asynchronous PZT guided-wave and FBG strain data yields HI MAE/RMSE <0.1 and localization MAE/RMSE <0.0465/0.1571, beating single-sensor and SOTA DNN baselines by ~60% on ReMAP composite fatigue panels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.