REVIEW 2 cited by
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Cutting-edge diffusion models produce images with high quality and customizability, enabling them to be used for commercial art and graphic design purposes. But do diffusion models create unique works of art, or are they replicating content directly from their training sets? In this work, we study image retrieval frameworks that enable us to compare generated images with training samples and detect when content has been replicated. Applying our frameworks to diffusion models trained on multiple datasets including Oxford flowers, Celeb-A, ImageNet, and LAION, we discuss how factors such as training set size impact rates of content replication. We also identify cases where diffusion models, including the popular Stable Diffusion model, blatantly copy from their training data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Ambient Diffusion Omni: Training Good Models with Bad Data
Ambient Diffusion Omni trains diffusion models on mixed-quality data by learning when corrupted images can be treated as clean, improving generation quality and diversity.
-
Explorative Modeling: Unlocking a Third Pretraining Axis and End-to-End Generation
Training on the best of K generated candidates improves image, video, and language generative models, with the reported gains growing with scale and enabling single-pass end-to-end generation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.