Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-hop Machine Reading Comprehension Datasets and Metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.04070 v1 pith:STHJBETD submitted 2022-12-08 cs.CL cs.LG

A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-hop Machine Reading Comprehension Datasets and Metrics

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords multi-hopdatasetsmetricsbeencomprehensiveevaluationcomprehensiondetail
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Multi-hop Machine reading comprehension is a challenging task with aim of answering a question based on disjoint pieces of information across the different passages. The evaluation metrics and datasets are a vital part of multi-hop MRC because it is not possible to train and evaluate models without them, also, the proposed challenges by datasets often are an important motivation for improving the existing models. Due to increasing attention to this field, it is necessary and worth reviewing them in detail. This study aims to present a comprehensive survey on recent advances in multi-hop MRC evaluation metrics and datasets. In this regard, first, the multi-hop MRC problem definition will be presented, then the evaluation metrics based on their multi-hop aspect will be investigated. Also, 15 multi-hop datasets have been reviewed in detail from 2017 to 2022, and a comprehensive analysis has been prepared at the end. Finally, open issues in this field have been discussed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interpretable Physics Reasoning and Performance Taxonomy in Vision-Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    A new automated benchmark of 2D physics questions finds vision-language models are stronger on formulaic tasks than on spatial reasoning, and parameter count does not fully explain performance.